Thank you to all the subscribers to my podcast for their encouragement.
The podcast is available at this link
https://www.buzzsprout.com/666235
The podcast is available at this link
https://www.buzzsprout.com/666235
I admit that I am a good communicator, but to label me a gossip is both hurtful and defamatory. I am a caring person and if I do pass on information it is for the good of the community, even if it turns out to be wrong. Alternatively, it is entertaining tittle tattle. Surely the law is not taking away the basic right of a chat between acquaintances, however distant?
(name and address withheld)
Dear Enquirer,
The victims of gossip, understandably, often turn out to have no sense of humour about it at all.
If you have gone too far, a quick apology, given and accepted, is the best course of action for all parties. The alternative is to wait and see if the victim will sue you for defamation which can be a successful strategy, depending on the seriousness of your defamatory statements. Lawyers and probably spouses can help even stubborn people to assess the stupidity of their statements.
You could claim “qualified privilege” in that you acted reasonably, not recklessly in making the defamatory statements even if they turned out to be wrong. A court will consider if it was your duty to make the statement e.g. a member of your staff had a terrible secret, or it was in the public interest e.g. your mother-in-law is an axe murderer. The person you tell must also have a need to know. For instance, your mother-in-law’s next door neighbour probably does not need to know about your employee’s secret but may find it useful to know about your mother-in-law.
You must act sensibly and check your source. If it is someone who is unreliable or is as big a gossip as you, then it may be best not to pass it on, especially if it will have serious consequences e.g. your mother-in-law’s arrest, detention and trial, even if she is eventually acquitted. Consider instead, confronting the accused person as people often get the wrong end of the stick.
If all else fails, there may be a few gossips on the jury who would empathize with you and quickly decide that you are blameless. But I would not count on it.
J.F.
*Letter reproduced with the kind permission of estate of John Fytit, legal agony aunt.
Extract from "The Art of War, Peace & Palaver: The Contentious Guide to Legal Disputes"
This article is also available as a Podcast. If you would prefer to listen to this and other legal content please go to the "Law" Podcast :
Click here if you need to speak to a lawyer dealing with Litigation
Click here for more legal books and eBooks by Paul Brennan
If there was an Oscar for the best criminal defence ever it would go to what I know as, the “Jump Up” defence.
Imagine that you are a criminal. You have just stolen a TV and you are carrying it down the street. A policeman catches you red-handed. Being a criminal, you say nothing. At your trial you say that you were walking along the road when a man said to you, ”Do you want to make some cash?". Being out of work, you agreed. The man told you to pick up a TV and follow him. You were following him with the TV when the policeman stopped you.
In criminal trials, the prosecution must prove the case beyond reasonable doubt so that the jury is sure. Juries often give the defendant the benefit of the doubt especially where the Jump Up defence is used.
So why doesn’t everyone plead clever defences like the Jump Up?
Well, defence lawyers are not able to assist their clients (even a little bit) in concocting untrue defences and although defendants often learn basic defence strategy in prison, some display a marked lack of creativity. After all, they can’t all have brilliant criminal minds; if they were that smart at school they would now be bank managers.
What lawyers will not do, is represent you in a not guilty plea to the court if they know that you are guilty. I have had to work with some lousy, implausible defences over the years, but some have turned out to be true—so you never know. The only way for your lawyer to be sure that you are guilty, is for you to tell him.
© Paul Brennan 2006-2018. All rights Reserved.
Extract from "The Art of War, Peace & Palaver: The Contentious Guide to Legal Disputes"
As I started, I could see that of the six hundred strong audience,
some were milling around at the back, but in the middle behind a long table
spanning horizontally across the hall was what I could only describe as a phalanx of rugby players. Jackets off, sitting
facing me in shirt sleeves, arms folded, wearing their napkins on their
foreheads and tucked behind their ears in the style of Egyptian pharaohs.
My opening lines failed to raise a laugh, as did
anything else I had to say. After several minutes, dinner rolls started
to wing their way over the napkinned heads of the phalanx and thud against the
canvas backdrop behind me. Thankfully the barrage was from a section of the
audience who were either very kind or couldn’t throw straight. Unscathed, I
pressed on.
Later in the speech, a member of the audience
bearing a sort of manic grin marched military-style up to the stage with the
apparent intention of helping me off. He had been drinking. He paused,
looked around, then turned and walked back to his seat. He may have taken pity
upon me. Another explanation is that I was once a judo instructor and
this was mentioned by the person who introduced me. I continued without him.
When something like this happens, it is best to put it behind you. The following Monday, the speech was reported in the South China Morning Post.
A couple of months later, I gave a speech at the Lighthouse Club. It was another black-tie dinner. Then I attended the next Lighthouse Club Dinner to hear celebrated barrister Kevin Egan speak. He was facing criminal charges of assisting disgraced government lawyer Warwick Reid to flee to the Philippines while on bail by giving him a passport and a gun. I had visited Warrick Reid, who was being held in ICAC custody.
During the introduction of Kevin Egan, the introducer thanked me for my funny (sic) speech, which had been well received, or at least no one had thrown anything. I went up to the microphone and said, “if you knew this audience, you would have kept that gun”. I still regret saying this. I had been drinking. Fortunately, Kevin Egan took it in good heart and was later acquitted.
Years
later, I joined other speakers at the National Speakers of Australia Conference
to present on challenging speaking experiences. My story prompted one of the
other speakers, Rodney Marks to tell of a similar occurrence. Out of a hostile audience, a
drunk had mounted the stage, as they grappled and fell to the floor, he continued with his speech.
The audience thought it was part of his act.
© Paul Brennan 2021. All rights Reserved.
Joel Oster is a lawyer from Kansas, USA. You can listen via his website , Apple Podcasts , or Spotfiy.
Click to listen on GooglePlayBooks.
Review by Law Institute Journal (Victoria)
There are few better at the art of skewering the pretensions and
idiosyncrasies of legal practice than Queensland lawyer Paul Brennan, author of
the Law & Disorder website which, for years, has been dispensing useful
legal advice heavily disguised as comedy. As well as tips on topics such as “The
10 greatest legal mistakes in business . . . and how to avoid them”, the site
is host to caustic and comic legal cartoons, an eZine and more.
The book grew out of Paul’s blog of the same name. He said he
decided on 101 reasons as he didn’t want to depress the entire legal profession
by having 1001.
But there’s nothing depressing about 101 Reasons, with its advice about the
things lawyers should know about but might not, such as the secret of enjoying
committee meetings, how to field complaints, career planning and dealing
successfully with their own legal problems. It is also about things Paul says
lawyers are not expected to know about but probably should such as change,
innovation, emotions, relationships and sex”.
Law Institute
Journal (Victoria)
September 2013 87 (9) LIJ, p.86
- the ultimate accessory for success in the law |
Sponsored by Brennans solicitors |
sponsored by Brennans solicitors |
Sponsored by Brennans solicitors |
Sponsored by Brennans Solicitors |
Sponsored by Brennans solicitors |