Legal cartoons and humorous comment (c) Paul Brennan. All rights reserved.

I decided on 101 reasons as I didn’t want to depress the entire legal profession by having 1,001.
Paul Brennan, Lawyer, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia

Sunday, November 29, 2015

The Great Unread

As a law student, I spent hours reading a law book. It was the longest week of my life.

Then I discovered that law students don’t read law books. They are to be carried, taken home once, then placed on bookshelves and finally sold to next year’s law students in pristine condition.

For lawyers, unlike participants in the four-minute mile or the Tour de France, taking shortcuts is understandable when reading traditional law books. But still, we legal authors find it difficult not to include everything that we know and a great deal that we don’t know.

I wanted to write law books that people including lawyers would have the satisfaction of reading cover to cover. I was prepared to take the risk that they would discover that my books were total rubbish as opposed to traditional law books where they could never be sure. This new approach called for law books to be either shorter or more interesting. I chose short.

I soon found that I could leave out a few hundred pages, and readers either didn’t notice or didn’t mind. In my first book “Law for IT Professionals” I was complimented by one reviewer (there was only one) for summarising the rest of the law in eighteen pages.

Other legal authors found that my brief and short (“BS”) approach to law suited them too and cut hundreds of pages from their titles. They found as I did that they were far easier to carry around and introduce into conversations.

One disappointment is that the second-hand market in short law books is disappointing. On one occasion, I happened to be in Dymocks in Sydney and on requesting my own book (posing as a discerning reader) I was told, “You are in luck, they are now fifty per cent off.”

Sponsored by Brennans Solicitors

Sunday, November 8, 2015

New Book : I'll Have The Law On You - The Selected Letters of John Fytit


This is the first major edition of John Fytit’s* works and is as close as we will come to the autobiography that he never wrote.

Readers of his legal advice column will have followed Fytit’s journey from embittered sole practitioner to liberated and unrestrained legal adviser.

His thirty years’ experience in legal misfortunes equipped him to give the public the legal advice they truly desired.

Variously known as a Legal Agony Aunt and Legal Agony Ombudsman, his ambition to be a Legal Agony Commissioner was cut short.

*Pronounced “Fight it” and not “Fit it”.

Sunday, October 11, 2015

Does the profession have a drug problem?

Lawyers Weekly reports "There have always been whispers within the legal profession of social cocaine use among top-end lawyers. How deep does the problem go?". 

Coke, dope, ice: Does the profession have a drug problem?

Monday, October 5, 2015

Ten things that I wish I knew when I started out in the law

Ten things that I wish I knew when I started out in the law

1. It is not always possible to predict clients’ legal problems before they sit down.
2. Unlike a doctor, having a heartbeat is not the only qualification to look for in a potential client. Mutual respect is desirable.
3. “Do nothing” can be the best advice to resolve a legal issue.
4. Rule 1: Read the file before asking your boss a question. Rule 2: See Rule 1.
5. There can be a gap between what clients want you to do and what is in their best interests.  
6. It is human nature for people to value legal advice more if they pay for it. It is more likely that they will accept and act upon it.
7. Other people's problems are easy; your own are baffling.
8. Legal moves can attract reactions try to think what they may be in advance.
9. Never look back at a closed file as you may see a problem that would otherwise have resolved itself.
10. Never answer the office telephone at 4.59 pm on Friday. 

Sponsored by Brennans solicitors

Thursday, September 3, 2015

Good Will Hunting

Dear John

I wish to make a will, but I do not have enough to go around. I fear that the Will may get into the wrong hands and cause upset to those who do not get a mention.

JB, Sydney

Dear JB

It used to be that when you made a will it was stored away so that not even your lawyer could find it. But in this digital age there are multiple copies of wills on computers, attached to an email, etc. This means that people worry that their relatives and friends may get to see the Will before they go and get upset that they have been left out or in some cases not been left enough. Such fear can drive clients to make wills that resemble an Oscar acceptance speech.

If your estate is modest then in order to give something to everyone your lawyer can slice and dice your assets into bequest sized packages and add a few things that you do not own now but aspire to own by your death such as a Morgan, Rolex watch, villa in the South of France, etc.   Gifts can be spread further by giving jointly to several beneficiaries, or for life, or in succession i.e. if the legatee predeceases you then someone else gets it. Add a “survivor takes all clause” and you could increase the longevity of even the frailest family member.

You will no longer need to fear a pre-death glimpse or even a full-scale relative review of your will. A carefully drafted will can contain a cast of beneficiaries who would do credit to a Cecil B. De Mille epic.

You will find yourself gaining in popularity as your will delights family and friends alike. Not to mention a bigger turnout at your funeral even if it is raining.

John Fytit
Extract from - I'll have the law on you -selected letters of John Fytit to be published later this year. 

(c) Paul Brennan 2015. All rights reserved. 

Saturday, June 20, 2015

Free Speech in the Home

Dear John

Now that the children have left home, my wife says that I am not allowed to shout at the cat anymore in case the neighbours think that I am shouting at her. Is there no end to censorship?


Dear BC

Free speech is under attack not only in our households but everywhere. It is not possible to criticise certain causes without being subjected to a full hue and cry. I will not mention those causes here for obvious reasons.

Joseph Stalin once said “Remove the man, remove the problem”. This can not only be applied to cats but also to wives, husbands and other family members.

Extract from - "I'll have the law on you -selected letters of John Fytit" to be published later this year. 

(c) Paul Brennan 2015. All rights reserved. 

sponsored by Brennans solicitors

Sunday, June 14, 2015

Car Parking Space Abuse

There is a time in a movie when the mild mannered citizen finally cracks and seeks retribution. This is how I felt the other morning when someone parked in my car parking space. In Queensland, we do not strap on our Colt 45, or load up our shotgun we use stickers.

Despite being red, bearing the word WARNING, containing threats of a financial penalty  and the car being towed away stickers have proven less effective than lynching.

One problem is that the sticker repeats the same threats that appear on the Warning Sign which the offender ignored on the way into the car park. To be effective threats must escalate. For instance, attach a rock to a sticker bearing the words “We know where you live”.

If your Warning Sign is being ignored ditch the legalese and put something more compelling such as “Ebola Research Centre”.

Victims are urged not to place the sticker on the windscreen but on a side window so that the offender’s line of sight is not impaired during the getaway. Whereas victims call for poster sized Warning Stickers.

At midday I looked out the window, the offending car was gone and I reclaimed my space. It was then that three things occurred to me:
1.       It had been the morning of our trust account audit;
2.       The auditor had left just before noon; and
3.       As I had stuck the sticker on the windscreen I was impressed by  the neatness of the car interior.

Whether or not, it was a friendly fire sticker incident we will hopefully never know.

Would it help to give Warning Stickers legal authority? Yes, but only if there was someone (possibly  a masked stranger)  ready  to enforce such laws against wrong doers.

Sunday, May 17, 2015

Your inheritance is free – but is it safe?

Many family issues are common place:

Your wayward son is not unique especially when drink is involved. 
If your daughter-in-law is a fright, you are not alone.
And I will not start you off on your husband.

You have reached an age where you can see the big picture and your mother was right. 

Now what? Well, it will take determination, strength and a legal fees…. but first read Hang on to it girl - The Wily Woman's Guide to Wills. 

Cherie Blair described this book as “funny and short”, or at least I think she was referring to the book. 

“Guaranteed to make the woman of the house laugh which could be a first in some cases” John Fytit, lawyer.
Sponsored by Brennans Solicitors

Monday, April 6, 2015

Moving Courts On-Line

Dear John 

I understand that there is a big push worldwide to move courts online to increase efficiency and reduce cost. Will this really help?


Dear C.L.

Although we should keep certain traditions such as having everything in triplicate, many welcome law-on-line as an opportunity for reform.

Here are five proposals:

  1. There is no need to have a judge at every court. In the eleventh century, itinerant judges went from town to town on particular circuits dispensing the King’s justice as required. Judges could be kept at a central location called a “Home” and sent to courts on request. How often would that be? Well, according to focus groups - never. But, even if it were not often, there would still be substantial savings. 
  2. Already in our courts, oral submissions have for the most part been replaced with written submissions. Would it not be more efficient to have an on-line questionnaire with a choice of four answers “Yes”, “No”, “It all depends” or “I don’t know”?
  3. Legal service consumers who have long complained about the performance and appearance of their lawyers should have a choice between standard lawyers and muscle bulging digitized virtual lawyers equipped with the type of weaponry available in any computer game. 
  4. Prison sentences and other old fashioned penalties could be replaced with virtual punishment. For instance, virtual tagging preventing offenders from going on Facebook. Community service could be served in Second Life.
  5. I have long thought that a jury of twelve is far too small. In ancient Athens juries consisted of five hundred citizens. We could easily outdo this by using Twitter. If submissions were only 140 characters, cases could be over in minutes. 

I do not agree with those who wish to replace familiar terms such as “plaintiffs” and “defendants” with something less confrontational such as “survivors”. However litigants should be allowed to choose their own court persona to protect their privacy and spice up the court lists.

How much saving could such reforms achieve? Well, if Instagram can manage thirty million subscribers with thirteen staff I think we can do better than that.


Extract from - I'll have the law on you -selected letters of John Fytit to be published later this year. 

(c) Paul Brennan 2015. All rights reserved. 

Sponsored by Brennans solicitors

Sunday, March 15, 2015

“No Frills” Courts

Dear John

Sturdy docks and wooden benches have been replaced by plastic chairs and flimsy furnishings in our courtrooms in a “No Frills” initiative. Is this not an affront to the dignity of the judicial process?


Dear J.S.

There may be some room for “No Frills” cutbacks on judges’ lodgings, for instance but I agree that the courtroom is the showcase of our entire judicial system. 

Airlines vary their service offering based on the quality of the passengers. There is a natural legal pecking order that would lend itself to this approach in our courtrooms. For instance, senior members of the profession should have First Class seating especially for long haul trials. At tense moments, oxygen masks could drop down. For emergencies, there could be dinner jackets underneath the seats.

We would all gain from sick bags being available especially during the submissions of certain well-meaning advocates.

After lunch, lights could be dimmed, and anyone wishing to pay attention could use their reading lights. 

Once we have the right seating, there will be no need to go to the canteen for morning tea. It could be brought in by the ushers thereby increasing efficiency. 

Bathroom breaks have always been an issue. But a light saying “remain seated” operated by the judge could be usefully combined with tannoy announcements throughout the courthouse to ensure we did not miss anything.  

Young lawyers would from time to time be upgraded from economy seating.

I am not in favour of earphones, movies and magazines, but these should be optional in the public gallery. Such options would be far more effective in achieving a dignified silence than the cold stares of police and ushers. 

Add a court miles scheme, experiments with massage and our courts would once again become the envy of the legal world. 

John Fytit

Extract from - I'll have the law on you -selected letters of John Fytit to be published later this year. 

(c) Paul Brennan 2015. All rights reserved. 

Sponsored by Brennans solicitors

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Employees, “Pick up your banner and move forward...”

Almost ten years ago, I established Employee Legal Awareness Day. This year, it was mentioned by the United Nations (slightly) and various other organisations and companies around the world.

One website suggested that the day could be used by employees for protest and street demonstrations. Although this is not quite what I had in mind, it is probably the sort of encouragement that propelled lawyer, Fidel Castro to his destiny. 

We have already started planning next year. Will the Soviet Union be turning up? I don’t think so. Why do you ask?

(c) Paul Brennan 2015. All rights reserved. 

Sponsored by Brennans solicitors

Employee Legal Awareness Day takes place each year on February 13th. It is to emphasize the importance of legal education for employees and small businesses to reduce their risk of legal problems. Comrades (with or without banners) welcome. For more information contact Paul Brennan at

Sunday, February 8, 2015

Robots to Replace Young Lawyers by 2030

Despite Moore’s Law, to create a robot that knows everything is far too ambitious. I suggest that they start by replacing sole practitioners and work their way up to young lawyers.

Legal robots (“Law-bots”) would offer solutions to the many problems that have beset clients for millennia. For instance:
1. Law-bots could be programmed to have a sense of humour.
2. Airborne Law-bots called “Drones” could attend the scene of legal arguments to quickly resolve legal disputes. The prospect of more than one Drone turning up, some equipped with armaments, would need to be thought through. 
3. Law-bots could be programmed to always say yes to business deals. There would need to be the necessary adjustment to professional insurance contributions and an increase in Litigation-bots to deal with the fall out.
4. Trial by combat could be reintroduced with 300 lb Law-bots acting as champions. 
5. Judges would delight in a volume dial/stop button for Trial Attorney-bots.
6. Judge-bots could be programmed not to listen without nodding off.
7. Lawyers could offer value by diversifying their product offering. From a superior Rolex-bot with gold trim for expensive disputes to the Home Law-bot dealing with domestic arguments and folded away when not in use, even doubling as a dishwasher.

There would be female F-Law-bots to demonstrate the profession’s commitment to diversity and equal opportunity. However, they would not be programmed to wash up, or collect the dry cleaning to prevent any claims of Bot-Abuse. 

Above all Legalbotics would offer substantial savings e.g. In-house Law-bots would not need five star hotels and share options.

Law-bots are an opportunity for lawyers to relaunch their brand and create a new image which would make legal jokes a thing of the past. 

This is our chance to throw off the glasses, the comb over and release the Dalek, or indeed the R2-D2 within us.

(c) Paul Brennan 2015. All rights reserved. 

Sponsored by Brennans solicitors

Sunday, February 1, 2015

Sex in the Dock - The Lady Chatterley’s Lover Trial

In 1960 at the Old Bailey, Penguin faced prosecution under the Obscene Publications Act for its publication of Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H. Lawrence who had died in 1930.

In the book, Lady Chatterley has an affair with her husband’s gamekeeper as her husband is unable to have sexual intercourse due to a WW1 injury.

Did the book tend to deprave and corrupt? If so, was its publication 'for the public good' on the grounds of its literary merits?

Apart from the “f” word being used 30 times, the Prosecutor listed sexual intercourse taking place “thirteen times” including in “her husband’s house,…a hut,…the undergrowth,…when stark naked and dripping with raindrops…" He concluded, “And finally…we have it all over again in the attic in a Bloomsbury boarding-house.”

The Prosecutor asked, “Would you approve of your… young daughters – because girls can read as well as boys – reading this book?... Is it a book that you would even wish your wife or servants to read?”

The Defence said that society cannot fix its standards by what is suitable for a 14-year-old.

Over a six-day trial there were a number of witnesses, including:

1. Author Rebecca West who gave evidence that the book had literary merit, but was badly written by a man who had no sense of humour and no background of education in his home.  
2. The Bishop of Woolwich who agreed that Christians ought to read it. This led to the headline in the evening papers, “A Book all Christians should read”.

The Defence contended that Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra may as well have been a “story of a sex-starved man copulating with an Egyptian Queen.”

The Judge summed up suggesting that the jury think of “factory girls reading in their lunchtime.”

After a six-day trial, the Jury found Penguin not guilty.

(c) Paul Brennan 2015. All rights reserved. 

Sponsored By Brennans solicitors

Sunday, September 28, 2014

The family lawyer is dead

Q. Our family has had the same lawyer for years but in his efforts to be even-handed he seems to be giving equal weight to the views of my daughter-in-law even when they contradict my own.

A. The day of the genial lawyer steering generations of the same family through their legal affairs has gone. We have had to specialise as family members have become more self-centred and unwilling to follow the guidance of the matriarch.

There are specialist lawyers for each member of the family. One national law firm, “Drinking Works” has gone after the trillion dollar “wastrel sons” market. The moment it got out that interviews were held in the local bar starting at lunchtime the work dried up for the rest of us.

I have had to re-organise my firm and decided to target the unappreciated husbands and fathers market which has long needed an advocate. I am considering rebranding my firm to “Wife Works” which I believe will have appeal to many husbands. I dismissed the idea of “Child at Uni Works” after several trials.

With both husband and wife separately represented, Saturday night arguments would need to be rescheduled to office hours  leading to increasingly peaceful “off the record” weekends. A wife’s alleged nagging would take the form of carefully crafted letters and result in less repetition. A detailed and accurate record of the husband’s failings would be available for later court proceedings and the wife’s friends, over coffee.

What slightly crazed and cranky uncle would not be happier with an equally irrational lawyer being irritated on his behalf? Larger law firms could stop hiding such practitioners or forcing them into practice on their own. 

With animal rights specialists, the family dog could demand rather than beg.

A Mother-in-Law Law Specialist can give you the support and empathy that you may need.

Extract from - I'll have the law on you -selected letters of John Fytit to be published later this year. 

(c) Paul Brennan 2014. All rights reserved. 

Sponored by Brennans solicitors

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Your Dad and his money

Warning: The is an extract from the Law & Disorder eZine which adopts a humorous approach to alert those who have yet to face certain legal issues. If your father is getting on and losing his mind, see a lawyer. However if he is only at the stage of losing his car keys, read on. 
Your Dad and his money

Has your Dad lost his marbles? If so, it is all over for him making a will in your favour, or changing an existing will to disinherit a few of your siblings as he does not have the mental capacity to do so. On the positive side once he has “lost capacity” you do not need to visit him so often, to avoid losing out.

A lawyer will often send aged clients off to a doctor to witness the will and also they will ask questions (and take detailed notes) to determine if their client knows:
  • That he is making a will?
  • How much he is worth?
  • Who he would normally leave it to and in what proportions?
  • And that he does appear sane.

The more complex the will or the change, the more “on the ball” the testator and lawyer must be.

A general suspicion of lack of capacity e.g. age and/or illness is not enough for a court, there must be clear evidence of significant doubt that the testator had capacity.

The onus of proof weighs on those supporting the will. The court will look at any suspicious behaviour (often helpfully supplied by an ex-wife). Or suspicious circumstances, such as any irrational provisions, beneficiaries excluded unexpectedly or undue influence (e.g. carer windfalls).

Trials are awash with evidence of bitter relatives and concerned neighbours together with medical evidence. Your lawyer with his notes will be a star witness.

Your lawyer may use his own sanity as a benchmark which can be a very low hurdle. The chances of your lawyer being sued in borderline cases by disinherited beneficiaries are quite high.

Therefore, do not expect any senior citizen discounts next time that you wheel your old decrepit dad in for a will. Your lawyer will check to ensure that their client is sane, whereas normally there is no such obligation.

(c) Paul Brennan 2013. All rights reserved. Paul Brennan is the author of The Legal Guide to Dying...Baby Boomers Edition which you can download from Amazon.

Sunday, August 3, 2014

The Art of War and advising clients

Dear John

With the internet, the first interview with a client can be like a tutorial on the subject of their legal issue. I find it very enlightening, but wish to return to the days when I gave insightful comments rather than just listening attentively and looking it up later.


Dear M

I have known clients to painstakingly research the law on the internet only to find it had changed by the time that they got to my office. After spending hours trawling the internet, I believe clients have a better understanding of what we have had to put up with. They are relieved when I refuse to trot out the usual legal claptrap and instead focus on their issue.

I seldom use law at all, and rely on the Art of War by Sun Tzu, which is a manual on warfare written 2,500 years ago. It is a sort of Quentin Tarantino version of Don't Sweat the Small Stuff.

The Art of War is extremely effective in planning strategies but combine its authority with the benefit of hindsight and you will once again find yourself offering sage, insightful comments to appreciative clients.

What clients do not want to hear that their previous lawyer had disastrously and expensively laid a prolonged siege rather than rushing forward to secure a quick victory, or had rushed forward rather than adopting safer ground until the time was right?

I first started to use the Art of War to convince trainee lawyers that everything was their fault as any discussion with them involving law always left me feeling that I was to blame.

Once you are known as an Art of War Practitioner other lawyers may no longer feel smug at your inaction as appearing to do nothing is the ultimate deception. You will feel a general euphoria that however bad things may appear, a brilliant unfathomable plan is at work and will come to you eventually.

At thirteen chapters, the Art of War is a far easier read than the entire common law, and you will be pleased to know that there was no Latin in Ancient China.


Extract from - I'll have the law on you -selected letters of John Fytit to be published later this year. 

(c) Paul Brennan 2014. All rights reserved. 

Sponsored by Brennans solicitors

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Book Review by the Journal of the Law Society of Scotland

When asked, “Why 101 reasons”, Paul Brennan, who is a practising lawyer, explained: “I didn’t want to depress the entire legal profession by having 1,001.”
Having started life as a blog, this book combines cartoons, satire and anecdotes about our profession. Some of them may even be true. Almost without exception they contain something to make the more self-aware pause and reflect on how we have gone about our business.
Let’s start with the introductory page. Lawyers, we are told, are thought to be arrogant, pompous, aggressive, tactless, confrontational, pedantic, expensive, unscrupulous, ruthless, negative, devious and slow. It is suggested that one of the main causes of stress in the profession is the difficulty many of us have in living up to these expectations at all times. One lawyer, who declined to be interviewed, confessed that on occasion he spoke to his staff in a normal manner: one client, who did not wish to be named, said that he found his lawyer “quite nice.” O tempora, o mores. Rumour has it that some have turned to training organisations which deal with medical receptionists because of their ability to generate aggression and ill will among patients with such minimal interaction.
Nonsense aside, this book will make you laugh out loud. Buy it for your waiting room; buy it for your lawyer friends, or just buy it for yourself. A treat.
David J Dickson
Books Review Editor

sponsored by Brennans solicitors

An Inspiring story for Prosecutors

Dear John

With crime rates falling, we Prosecutors have had to turn to our back catalogue of offences by ageing celebrities but with memories lapsing and witnesses dying the evidence in such cases can be questionable.

Should we just wait and hope that crime picks up, or should we press on and take what we can get?


Dear P.

There is no patron saint of hopeless cases, but there are many examples of Prosecutors pulling some very unlikely convictions out of the hat.

For instance, during the Napoleonic wars a ship’s pet monkey was shipwrecked on a beach in the North of England. The locals captured the monkey mistakenly believing it to be a French spy as it was dressed in military uniform.

The monkey was interrogated, tried, found guilty and hung. 

In that case, the burden would have been on the Prosecutor to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the monkey had an intention to spy-no easy task.

Let us not forget the defence lawyer’s task of taking clear instructions long before the advent of dedicated Animal Rights Lawyers.

All this, on a windy beach, with the constant chatter of the defendant in the background.

It is work like this which is an inspiration to Prosecutors everywhere.

Ed  note: Years ago, I was asked to represent a defendant before a Magistrates Court. I calculated his legal aid contribution, and when I told him that he would need to contribute $2.00 for my services, he decided to represent himself. He gets out next week.

Extract from - I'll have the law on you - The selected letter of John Fytit  
(c) Paul Brennan 2014. All rights reserved. 

Sponsored by Brennans solicitors

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Subway allegedly Held to Ransom

Last year, my son, introduced me to the delights of the Meat Ball Sub. I even mentioned Subway at my daughter's wedding. So, when Channel 7 Breakfast Show "Sunrise" asked me to comment on an alleged threat by a Subway franchisee to expose Subway's recipes on the internet if they did not pay him $35M, I could not here to see the interview.

For advice about legal issues concerning sandwiches or generallycontact Paul Brennan at Brennans solicitors.

Sponsored by Brennans Solicitors

Sunday, June 22, 2014

The Art of War - coping with conflict

Most people engage in litigation only once unless they have a very understanding spouse. At the outset, there is a lot to be gained by reading the Art of War by Sun Tzu, which is not only a manual of warfare, but a sage guide to engaging in conflicts both business and personal.

For those potential litigants who do not have the time to read the Art of War, here is the take home:

Twelve lessons for litigants from the Art of War by Sun Tzu

1.    Do not first fight and then look for victory.
2.    Supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting, next attacking in the field, the worst strategy is to besiege as prolonged warfare is expensive.
3.    Rapidity is the essence of war, take advantage of your enemy's unreadiness, march by unexpected routes and attack unguarded spots.
4.    The object of war is peace.
5.    When attacking leave an outlet free to make your enemy believe that there is still a safe road of escape as enemies in desperate straits will show a lack of fear.
6.    If the enemy has achieved an unassailable height before you do, do not follow, but retreat and try to entice your enemy away by threatening another place that he must relieve.
7.    If his forces are united, separate them.
8.    When faced with a superior enemy about to attack, begin by seizing something your enemy holds dear and then he will be amenable to your will (the “goolie manoeuvre”).
9.    Devise unfathomable plans while knowing your enemy’s disposition. Thereby, he must spread his resources whereas you can attack at his weakest point in strength.
10.  Win people over by kind treatment and use them as spies, as intelligence is of utmost importance.
11.  Warfare is based on deception, when able to attack seem unable, when active seem inactive, pretend to be weak so he may grow arrogant.
12.  To begin by bluster and then take fright at the enemy’s numbers shows a supreme lack of intelligence.

Having said that even a small homily from Sun Tzu within marriage is dangerous ground.  For instance, it is difficult to explain to a wife that the “object of war is peace” especially where a daughter in law is concerned.

This is an extract from the second edition of Unleashing the Dogs of Law which the author intends to get around to but for now the 1st edition is not bad. Click here to view the 1st edition.